Desk rejection reasons

WebIn many cases (70% of all rejections), this is not after peer review, but rather by “desk-rejection” where the handling editor decides to reject the manuscript before seeking the opinion of reviewers. The reasons for “desk-rejection” vary, but often are related to scope, novelty, quality of the reported work and/or quality of the writing. A desk reject, also known as a desk rejection, is when your paper is turned down by a journal, prior to them sending it out for review. This type of rejection can feel very disappointing, but don’t get too down on yourself. There are steps you can take to avoid this.

peer review - Editorial rejection: should I write back? - Academia ...

WebUniversity of Kelaniya Although this is not universal, here's a simple analysis of the most common reasons for rejection without peer review, so-called “desk-rejection”: The manuscript... WebJul 6, 2024 · 1. Our desk-reject rate is comparable to that of previous AJPS editorial teams. Dating back to 2015, the annual percentage of manuscripts that received a desk rejection varied from 21% to 27%. The slow upward trend is far less dramatic than the 60% increase in sumbissions during the same period. lithium ion investments https://reflexone.net

15 Most Common Reasons for Journal Rejection - Enago …

Weband the reason for rejection is -. 1. Reasons of desk rejection. This submission is summarily rejected because: - The paper is not formatted according to the NeurIPS requirements or it is not sufficiently anonymized. I checked and double checked the formatting and anonymization requirements - doesn't seem to be a problem. WebMay 10, 2024 · A desk-reject means your manuscript has been rejected by a journal without being sent out for review. Not only do you need to try your luck at another … WebMar 24, 2024 · Most papers submitted to a journal get desk rejected. There are myriad reasons for that - it's possible the flaws are stylistic, rather than rooted in the results. It may not be a good fit. There may be more compelling items in the queue. The editor may simply not share the opinion of the people who have emailed you. lithium ion inverter batteries

The North-Eastern Chronicle on Instagram: "<<27th June

Category:Why Do Manuscripts Get Rejected? A Content Analysis of Rejection ...

Tags:Desk rejection reasons

Desk rejection reasons

Eight reasons I rejected your article - Elsevier Connect

WebRejection was a common fate for manuscripts across the types of submission; figures ranged from 26.7% for viewpoint articles to 72.1% for review articles. The median time to desk rejection was 3 days, while the median time to post-peer-review rejection and post-editorial-re-review rejection was 42 days and 96 days, respectively. WebNov 11, 2024 · The median time to desk rejection was 3 days, while the median time to post-peer-review rejection and post-editorial-re-review rejection was 42 days and 96 …

Desk rejection reasons

Did you know?

WebThe North-Eastern Chronicle on Instagram: "&lt;&lt;27th June'21, State Desk ... WebMoore cites three reasons for journal ‘desk-rejection’. These represent the vast majority of prevalent short-comings among submissions that don’t even make it into review. Broadly speaking, they are as follows: Poor …

WebFeb 1, 2024 · So, it may not immediately indicate a desk rejection. :) It most probably means that the manuscript is being reviewed by the ME, who after checking for aspects like novelty and quality, will make an initial decision on the manuscript. This could be to send it for peer review or any of the outcomes mentioned in our previous response. WebThere can be lots of reasons for a desk rejection and it doesn't necessarily mean that you work is poor. Most of the time it can be as simple as your paper is a wrong fit for that journal. ... Desk-rejected three times for not fitting the scope (even though it very much did), and then transferred to a new open-access sub-journal to the much ...

WebSep 9, 2024 · When it comes to scholarly publishing, the reasons for rejection are often within your control and easily avoidable. Check out the top 5 mistakes that lead to … WebMay 27, 2024 · Reasons for desk rejection 1. Submitting a topic that is outside the scope of the journal Submitting such a paper typically represents a lack of preparation on the …

WebThe most common reasons for desk rejection were lack of novelty or being out of the journal’s scope. Inappropriate study designs, poor methodological descriptions, poor quality of writing, and weak study rationale were the most common rejection reasons mentioned by both peer reviewers and editorial re-reviewers. Conclusions: Common reasons ...

WebJul 6, 2024 · In “Against Desk Rejects!,”. Jim Gibson lays out a passionate case for why he believes desk rejections are a perversion of the double-blind peer-review process and serve to hamper scholars. 1 He also describes a set of reforms that he argues would solve the issue of the increase in manuscript submissions without editors resorting to desk ... impurity\u0027s nsWebFeb 14, 2024 · In general, can a paper be rejected for this/similarly trivial reason? Yes, that is possible. It depends on how many papers are submitted and how much space the journal has. It is not uncommon for a journal to have to reject 90% or more of the submissions. In those cases it helps everybody to reject early. impurity\u0027s noWebFeb 26, 2024 · Another common culprit of desk rejection is weak methodology. Perhaps the researchers used nonvalidated instruments or conducted a quasi-experiment when an experiment was warranted. Heed my words: seek study design and methods advice from experts before you begin your study! A weak methodology is a particularly disheartening … lithium ion inverters for saleWebWhen a scientific journal receives a new manuscript submission from an author, the manuscript is checked for plagiarism, and assessed carefully to determine if it fits the aims and scope of the journal. If journal … impurity\u0027s n9WebFeb 10, 2024 · Joona Räsänen. 1 year ago. Perhaps the only reason for desk rejection I can think of is that the paper is not interesting enough (based on the opinion of the editor reading it). And this means roughly that the paper is not in the subdiscipline that the editor has specialized herself. In the earlier post, Kauppinen suggest a few possible ... impurity\u0027s nrWeb56 minutes ago · Chinese Foreign Minister Qin Gang asserted on Friday that the country would not sell weapons to either parties involved in the Ukraine war. Meeting with German counterpart, China also expressed their willingness to find a resolution for the Ukraine conflict. Talking to presspersons along with Germany's foreign minister Annalena … impurity\u0027s nlWebSep 4, 2024 · The rejection reasons were "not novel", or "would be more suitable for a more specialized journal" – doodle man. Sep 3, 2024 at 18:58. 15. ... both sent "desk rejection" one saying "it was out of scope" and other one suggested couple other journals. I am not going to lie - "out of scope" is a bit the academic version of "it's not you, it's me ... lithium ion jump pack